Thursday, February 16, 2012

The Call to Action in the UMC - My thoughts

The United Methodist Church is preparing for our 2012 General Conference, at which delegates will vote on the proposals contained in the “Call to Action.” There are some specific changes being proposed, which you can read about at the Call to Action website.

I have a couple of questions. First one: Who is against these proposals? Is there any organized opposition to them, anywhere? I have read a couple of articles that expressed disappointment with the lack of young adult representation in the process and one or two that express the thought that this is a “power grab” by the Council of Bishops. But is there a group actively mobilizing to lobby General Conference delegates to vote down these proposals?

If so, please illuminate me, because I am unaware of them.

If not, then who in the world are we trying to convince with all the hub-bub about the changes? Why all the talk about “there’s no need to fear change” and “we’ve got to take some risks” and “sometimes change hurts” and so forth? Who exactly needs convincing? The denomination doth protest too much, methinks.

My second question: Why have we framed the Call to Action recommendations as necessary to save the United Methodist Church from dying? As I see it, the Call to Action recommendations are necessary, but not to save the denomination. What is recommended is necessary for no less than being faithful to what it means to be the church of Jesus Christ in the world today.

Now, if we revitalize congregations in the way that the Call to Action predicts, one of the attractive side effects may be that the United Methodist Church ceases withering away. But surely that’s not our goal, is it? I love the United Methodist Church as much as any seventh generation ordained Methodist preacher does, but my goal is not the survival of my beloved denomination.

My goal is to share the love of Jesus Christ with others so that that the world is completely transformed into the realization of the reign of God, and to inspire others to do so, as well. If the United Methodist Church survives that transformation process … bonus!

All of the language about what motivated the Call to Action’s proposed changes is great. Stuff like … creating vital congregations … a more nimble infrastructure … clarity of mission …hopefulness for the future … and so on. Everything Bishop Schnase (aka Bish Schnay-Z) writes about in his article on the subject.

But I’ll be hesitant to do any of that stuff if the goal is to save the denomination. Why can’t we just leave saving the denomination out of the picture?

Again, to be clear, I believe that if we do what the Call to Action recommends, we actually may end up saving the denomination. But that will be because our denomination is being as faithful an expression of church as it can be, not because our attempts to save our institution have been successful.

Actually I have a specific critique of the Call to Action recommendations. My biggest concern is that we do not have a consensus definition for pastoral effectiveness. I do not see how we possibly could. It will be a subjective call, no matter how you slice it.

I might think that I’m not effective because I’m not seeing worship attendance increase dramatically, while someone else might think I am being effective because there have been more than 50 professions of faith over the past two years. But still another person may think that 50 professions of faith is not effective, thinking that it comes nowhere close to the potential in our community.

What’s left is a subjective decision - which, by the way, I trust completely. I am Methodist, an itinerant preacher, and I will go where I am sent - even if that is into another occupation. But there’s no getting around the fact that pastoral effectiveness is ultimately a subjective decision. Let’s just be honest about that and proceed.

I hope the Call to Action recommendations pass General Conference, and revitalized, vibrant congregations become the norm rather than the exception. I too see a new church in the future, and am very hopeful about what God is up to these days. I just want us to stop lamenting dying churches and dying conferences and dying denominations, and start remembering what we are supposed to be about.

If we do, we may very well find that we actually have nothing to lament, and everything to celebrate!

6 comments:

Andy B. said...

Have you been reading Jeremy's stuff at hackingchristianity.net ? Fairly comprehensive and proposes an alternate structure. Also, the western jurisdiction bishops have recently written a letter against.

Amanda said...

The alternative proposal from MFSA has a lot of traction. I find this blog helpful in understanding the challenges in C2A. http://hackingchristianity.net/tag/calltoaction

Kansas Bob said...

Watched the video on the site you linked to. The UMC is losing 60k members a week? Did I hear that correctly? Small wonder folks are wanting action and change.

Anonymous said...

Here's a sample of some organized opposition from a General Church agency: http://www.umcom.org/site/apps/nlnet/content3.aspx?c=mrLZJ9PFKmG&b=4915433&ct=11605359

Chaussures Nike Femme said...

The actual Bests Pros were designed to breed mp3 as it appeared to be intended as observed, similar to facility keeps track of covering up your the ears. Put simply, people nailed the item. It doesnt matter what exactly model of music you prefer, the good qualities audio practically a person's origin content. Unlike the Sounds Dojos, a Sounds Positives don't have sounds special deal Beats by Dr. Dre headphones. Exactly why? For you to better replicate supply fabric.

Regardless of this as being a reasonable decrease in functions, this is really probably the greatest improvements with the Bests Master Beats by Dr. Dre. In place of noises special deal, that quite often discusses a background hiss, the good qualities whey isolate from the outside appear. They do it all extremely perfectly owing to washable significant solidity foam the ears mugs. Possibly with virtually no sound enjoying, Is better than Experts greatly reduce background noises low Beats by Dr. Dre. You may be in a position to hear tapping as well as louder sounds, only basically. It has like resorting the amount knob within the entire world downward from 12 to two. Music from even moderate degrees is enough to virtually die out of rest of the world thoroughly. This lets you listen to your own popular music for acceptable plus harmless concentrations since earphones won't be competing with anything else rather than your thoughts. And also, since i believe sound cancellation, you can't have to worry about power packs in any respect Beats by Dre. They may, however, turn you into need to re-encode all your tunes in a higher quality. They may get you to range from nil to audiophile throughout all 5 secs flat. Beats by dre headphones

Microsoft Office said...

Office 2010 combines everything you need to create, edit, and share documents from virtually anywhere. Easily manage cash-flow and other finances with ready-to-use templates in microsoft office 2010 Excel.