As we draw closer to the
2016 election, tensions seem to escalate. I am told that here in Greene County,
Missouri there will be armed security at every polling place this year, the
first time this has happened. Police officers and Sheriff’s deputies will be
present at the schools, churches, and other locations where we will vote, just
in case.
Just in case … what,
exactly? Just in case what? What country do we live in, again?
There surely have been
some elections in our history that were this antagonistic, this bitter, this
confrontational. Maybe 1968. But I sure don’t remember them in my lifetime.
Good, honest disagreement - yes. Rigorous debate - yes. But this? This is
scary.
But here’s the thing. I
don’t believe our nation is divided; I think it is polarized.
To me, “divided” implies
a split between two groups, in which every member of each group shares a common
perspective.
To me, the term
“polarized” implies a convergence of energy at two extremes, with a large
diverse group in between.
I think we are
polarized. The loudest voices are on the far edges, and they are getting all
the attention. The poles of our society have been empowered in this season, and
they are flexing. Hateful language, vilification of political opponents,
physically violent confrontations, willful ignorance, an attitude of
invincibility - all coming from the poles.
Meanwhile, most of us in
the middle majority are able to see nuance and subtlety, to be “conservative”
in some areas and “liberal” in others, to hold multiple ideas in our minds
simultaneously. The middle majority sees shades of gray rather than a black or
white dichotomy. But the middle majority doesn’t get a lot of press. We aren’t
newsworthy.
In this election season
there aren’t very many candidates at any level who come from this middle
majority. Thanks in part to dramatic redistricting in the last few years,
politicians often do not have to worry about representing an ideologically
diverse group of people. They can shift to the poles without fear, and they
have.
The question is then,
How can the Church best embody the Gospel in this polarized environment? In
many ways the polarization of our society has infiltrated the church itself. We
are, after all, people. The church is just the people who are a part of the
society, and prone to the same social forces that impact the greater whole.
A truly counter-cultural
way of being would be to drain energy from the poles and into the center. That
means each of us being okay with the idea that others may not see the world the
same way you do.
This means rising above
the rhetoric that vilifies a candidate, even a candidate with whom you do not
see eye-to-eye on anything.
This means naming and
resisting corruption, injustice, and oppression in whatever forms they present
themselves, including the systemic injustices embedded in our systems and
structures, without attacking people on a personal level.
This means speaking up
for all those whose voices have been lost in the cacophony of the 2016
campaign.
This means disagreeing without hating, arguing without yelling, debating without belittling.
If we might model this
way of being, Church, things might end up being okay after all. And I’m afraid
that if the Church can’t do it, then no one can. The Church is uniquely
structured to be just what our polarized world needs at such a time as this.
Now if we can only figure out how to actually be what we’re supposed to be!
No comments:
Post a Comment