It’s one of those phrases from scripture that is so well
known it has become a part of the common vocabulary - “Doubting Thomas.”
Problem is, it’s a misnomer.
Stick with me for a while here…
There is a word that means “doubt” in New Testament Greek.
It’s diakrino, and it’s found a few
times here and there in the New Testament, like Matthew 21:21 where Jesus says,
“If you have faith and do not doubt, you could say to the mountain, ‘Get up and
jump in the ocean,’ and it would.”
That’s a word John might have chosen if he had wanted it in
chapter 20, and John never wasted a word. The word John used in chapter 20
verse 27 is not diakrino, though. It
is apistos. That’s the word pistos, or “faith,” with the prefix a-, meaning “without.”
For those of you who are Greek Geeks, we’re talking about
the phrase μὴ γίνου
ἄπιστος ἀλλὰ
πιστός, in verse 27.
The NRSV and the NIV both have Jesus saying to Thomas, “Do
not doubt, but believe.”
The King James Version actually gets this one much closer to
right when it translates the phrase, “Be not faithless, but believing.”
I might translate it, “Don’t be faithless; be faithful.”
So what?
If you’ve skimmed the first few paragraphs, I hope you’ll
start reading now. This is the “So what” of that little linguistic exercise.
Too many people think that following Jesus doesn’t leave you
any room to doubt. “Doubting Thomas” is never intended as a compliment. We too
often think of “doubt” as the opposite of “belief,” which means it must be a
bad thing. And so many people go through life denying doubt, craving certainty,
and otherwise diminishing the mysteries of the cosmos.
As evidence, consider the overabundance of phrases like “The
Bible clearly says…” tossed so thoughtlessly about in so many conversations
these days. This theology says, “There’s one way to see things, and if you
don’t see things precisely that way, you are just wrong. And if you doubt any
of this stuff precisely the way it’s been presented … well, I’ll pray for you,
dearie!”
The way I see it, doubt is not the opposite of faith. As a
matter of fact, expressing your doubt can be an act of great faith. Faith is
what gives you the courage to continue on in the presence of doubt. Actually a
doubt that is expressed courageously and faithfully can lead to a fuller
understanding of the truth. On the other hand, stubborn unwillingness to
acknowledge doubt causes people to stagnate, and leaves them ill-equipped to
deal with life’s inevitable fluctuations.
Doubt leaves us room to dialogue with one another. Doubt
primes our curiosity. Doubt fuels discovery, pushing us deeper and stretching
us outward at the same time. I might even go so far as to say that doubt is
necessary for faith to mature.
Once the church taught that the earth was flat. Somebody
doubted that, and now we understand God’s creation much more fully. I imagine
there were many diverse responses to the newly offered hypothesis that the
earth is actually a sphere.
1 - One may
have rejected the new knowledge in favor of the orthodox doctrine.
2 - One may
have rejected the church, thinking that if you can’t trust one teaching, you
can’t trust any of them.
(Both of these responses reflect an immature understanding
of the creative power of doubt.)
3 - One may
have incorporated the new knowledge into a new understanding of God and grown
in the process.
(This response embraces the doubt and uses its power to
launch into a deeper truth.)
My advice? As soon as someone says, “The Bible clearly says”
or some similar code phrase that indicates they have no doubts, you should exit
the conversation. It isn’t going
anywhere, anyway. People with no doubts are scary to me. And people who insist
that nobody should have doubts when it comes to questions of faith are theological
tyrants.
Not only is doubt okay, it is holy. Doubt is necessary to maturing
in faith, and in life in general. I hope you will embrace your doubt, express
it with confidence, and see how you might just grow in the process.
