As an itinerant preacher, I am sent by the church to a
community in order to do ministry in that community alongside a congregation
for whom I provide spiritual, missional, and temporal leadership. Okay, so
there are a lot of prepositional phrases in that sentence - so first take note
of the basic subject and verb: I am sent. That is the heart of what it means to
be itinerant in the United Methodist Church, to be sent.
Here are three reasons why the itinerancy is perfectly
suited for the mission of 21st century church.
1) The itinerancy empowers prophetic ministry.
“I am sent ... by the church.” The mission of the church
guides the bishop in his or her discernment process. The bishop then acts on
behalf of the entire church, utilizing the authority granted her or him by the
church, to deploy leaders for that mission. Once deployed, I am accountable to
that very same mission, and the bishop holds me accountable to that mission
through my district superintendent.
And for the church’s mission in the 21st century this
accountability connection is vital. For example, sexism, racism, and any other
“-ism” congregation members may harbor will not unduly influence the decision
of who will lead them. For another, a preacher can say what needs to be said to
proclaim the Gospel and empower world-changing discipleship, without fearing
the consequences of making the congregation a bit uncomfortable when doing so.
Yes, I am accountable to the congregation as well, but my “direct supervisor”
is the superintendent.
2) The itinerancy allows the church to take context into
account.
“I am sent … to a community in order to do ministry in that
community.” The mission of the church happens outside of the building walls,
and itinerant preachers are sent to share the good news in particular
communities. That’s an important part of what it means to be Methodist, as our
founder made abundantly clear when he said, “The world is my parish.”
In the 21st century, the “mission field” of the church is
becoming more and more nebulous, and less and less reliant on the old “insider”
models of ministry. We are much less concerned with bringing “them” into the
church, and much more concerned with being the church “out there” in the world.
As an itinerant preacher, I can be sent to where my particular skill set
matches the leading edges of new mission fields most effectively, rather than
hired by a congregation to be “their” pastor.
3) The itinerancy facilitates grassroots ministry.
“I am sent … alongside a congregation for whom I provide
spiritual, missional, and temporal leadership.” Methodism has always been a
movement led by the laity; frontier preachers were sent to new towns, and
sometimes discovered that groups of Methodists had already begun meeting
together long prior to the preacher’s arrival. The healthiest United Methodist
congregations still follow that model for ministry today.
Which is exactly the right approach for the church in the
21st century. We live in an era in which “bottom-up” efforts are the norm, and
“top-down” initiatives are regarded with suspicion. Institutions are distrusted
and hierarchies are shunned. Grassroots efforts, shared on social media and
spreading quickly within communities, are nimble and energized and have great
power and effect. An itinerant preacher leads a congregation for a season,
stepping into a flowing stream and encouraging, equipping, and cheerleading the
lay-led ministry of the congregation, and then moves on to do the same elsewhere.
Of course, no church polity is perfect. I know colleagues
who have not experienced the itinerancy in the way I have, and I do not want to
belittle their experiences at all. This post was prompted by a post several of my friends shared online, so I’m sure there is disagreement among us as to the
efficacy of the itinerant ministry in today’s UMC.
But I happen to think that the itinerancy, especially how it is lived out here in Missouri, is perfectly suited for the prophetic, contextual, lay-led ministry that comprises the identity of the United Methodist Church. I believe it is the ideal way to deploy pastoral leadership for the 21st century.
But I happen to think that the itinerancy, especially how it is lived out here in Missouri, is perfectly suited for the prophetic, contextual, lay-led ministry that comprises the identity of the United Methodist Church. I believe it is the ideal way to deploy pastoral leadership for the 21st century.
2 comments:
This is the difference between being called to a vocation and having a "professional" career. "Careerists" do not want to leave where they are comfortable. "Vocationalists" go where they are called.
what I appreciate about itinerancy (says the guy whose moved once in 12 years) is that it keeps ME from always looking to greener pastures, and insulates me from the temptation of politicking for the sake of ladder climbing. I'd NEVER have come to my current church on my own, but it's been a blessing. I also appreciate the fact (as one who isn't afraid to ruffle feathers) that the congregation can't fire me when they get their shorts in a bunch. I wouldn't want to work under a call system.
Post a Comment