Within the United Methodist Church exist several unofficial
groups, organized for various reasons. Two of these groups are named the “Good News Movement” and the “Reconciling Ministries Network.”
The Good News Movement exists to ensure that people who are
gay are not permitted to be ordained or married. The Reconciling
Ministries Network exists for exactly the opposite reason, to ensure that
people who are gay are permitted to be ordained and married.
So, in our big tent of a denomination, it has become
customary to identify people who belong to one or the other of these groups by
using the name of the group. And so: “She is a Good News person” and/or “He is
a Reconciling person.” Just hearing those words associated in any way with an
individual in our denomination seems to immediately color one’s opinion of the
person in question, often without even actually knowing them. Which is sad, but
so it goes.
I want to talk about those names, strategically chosen to
identify these two polar opposite ends of our United Methodist spectrum. “Good
news.” “Reconciling.” Have these terms become nothing more to United Methodists
than political identifiers?
Truthfully, I am a “Good News” person. And truthfully, I am
a “Reconciling” person. And I want to be both of those things without having to
explain that I don’t want to carry the bitterly divisive baggage associated
with each.
I am a Good News person because I believe the Gospel. I
believe God loves the world so much that Christ Jesus laid down his own life so
that the world might live an abundant, everlasting life. I believe that the
teaching of Jesus, the promise of God, the abiding presence of the Holy Spirit
are all inherently good news for all people, as well as for each person
uniquely.
I am a Reconciling person because I take very seriously the
idea that God has entrusted the church with the ministry of reconciliation. I
believe that God’s desire is for unity, for people to be one community, to
encourage one another and lift one another up. And I believe that God has
called the church to make connections, build bridges, and heal broken
relationships.
And I’d like to ask very kindly … can we have our words
back, please?
No offense or anything, but I’d like to be able to use the
terms without having to explain that I don’t mean either of those groups. (I
feel the same way about the world “evangelical,” by the way.) I’d like to claim
to be a person of the Good News without people wondering if that means I don’t
want gay people to get married. I’d like to claim to be a minister of
reconciliation without people wondering if that means I was protesting at General
Conference.
And while I’m at it, let me share a couple other things that
I’d like to be able to do.
I’d like to be able to claim that one’s sexual orientation
should not be a barrier to ordination or marriage, without having my faith
questioned, without someone accusing me of disobedience to God, without someone
callously observing that I don’t take the Bible seriously, without someone
assuming I am breaking covenant with my denomination.
And on the flipside, I’d like to be able to say out loud that
change is happening in our church from the bottom up via a movement of the Holy
Spirit; and I’d like to be able to affirm that the official legislation is
going to catch up to that movement of the Spirit eventually rather than lead
it, as it should be. And I’d like to be able to do that without being accused
of not wanting justice now, without being compared to a “white moderate” of Dr.
King’s day, without someone telling me I have somehow “sold out” and become a
part of the system.
What I’m trying to say is that I’m a good news person. I’m a
reconciling person. I’m an evangelical person. I’m a progressive person. I’m an
orthodox person. I’m a social justice person. I’m a conservative person. I’m a
peacemaking person. I’m a Bible-believing person. I’m a truth-seeking person. I’m
a Wesleyan person. I’m …
I’m a Jesus person. I am a follower of Jesus Christ, and I
try with everything I am to follow him as closely as I possibly can. And I get
it wrong as often as I get it right, and I thank God for grace every single
day.
I still believe, despite the anxiety in the system, that we
can figure out a way to stay together as a denomination. I still believe that some
on the edges will end up leaving as a result of the Bishop’s commission’s plan.
And I know that some already have, pushed to do so by Bishop Oliveto’selection. Part of me grieves this; and another part of me is resigned to it. So
it goes.
Some will say that our unity arises from our doctrine; if we
do not ascribe to the same set of teachings, we should not be a united body.
Others will say that our unity arises from the Holy Spirit; that we are
mysteriously joined together with sacred bonds that transcend doctrine.
I find myself believing the latter; our unity is deeper than our doctrine. I’m a Jesus person, with all that comes along with that. And I trust, hope, and pray that the Jesus people who call ourselves Methodist will figure out a way to become the church that God is calling us to be.
I find myself believing the latter; our unity is deeper than our doctrine. I’m a Jesus person, with all that comes along with that. And I trust, hope, and pray that the Jesus people who call ourselves Methodist will figure out a way to become the church that God is calling us to be.
3 comments:
Hey, Andy, terrific post! I'd like to reprint on UM Insight. Let me know if you have any problems with that. Thanks! -- Cynthia Astle
Thanks Cynthia. Permission granted!
Thanks Cynthia. Permission granted!
Post a Comment