I have often wondered why the word “do-gooder” is often
spoken with such bitterness. What could possibly be wrong with someone who does
good stuff all the time?
Of course, the word means more than that. A “do-gooder” is a
term for a person who means well but may be naive in their expectations or
maybe actually ends up doing more harm than good, more getting in the way of a
solution than actually helping.
Nevertheless, we cannot fault a “do-gooder” for their
intentions. Scripture tells us to “not grow weary in doing what is right,” and
John Wesley picked up that theme with General Rule #2, which is quite simply
“Do Good.”
In a sermon titled, The Law Established Through Faith, he
said, “Thou shalt love thy neighbour as
thyself. Neither is love content with barely working no evil to our neighbour.
It continually incites us to do good: as we have time, and opportunity, to do
good in every possible kind, and in every possible degree to all men.”
His intention was that help would be offered to those in
need, both physically and spiritually. He made that crystal clear in his
direction to give food, give clothing, and care for the sick and those in
prison, in addition to “instructing, reproving, or exhorting” those around us.
In other words, love incites us to be a do-gooder! In the
best possible meaning of the term, of course, which may be something like “helping
people who need help in a way that is actually helpful to them.”
But the idea of “goodness” is subjective, it seems. What one
person considers a “good” action may not be considered “good” by another. It is
yet one more trait we lose as we age, the certainty of the “good guy” and the
corresponding “bad guy.” An eight year old playing with action figures harbors
no moral ambiguity.
Despite its subjective nature, there are tests by which
goodness can be assessed. In “Three Simple Rules,” Bishop Job wrote, “Every act
and every word must pass through the love and will of God and there be measured
to discover if its purpose does indeed bring good and goodness to all it
touches.” The love of God, and the will of God are two powerful checks on the
relative goodness of an action or a word.
Of course, the most obvious filter to run an act through is
Rule Number One itself – “Do No Harm.” If the action or the word (or the inaction
or the silence) actually does harm, then obviously it is not doing good, and
another option ought to be selected.
So let’s be a bunch of do-gooders! Let’s do good things for God’s sake, making the world a more loving and gracious place, helping people in need in the way they themselves have identified, and sharing all of those collective “good deeds” and “random acts of kindness” that people do every single day.
(Post One is here. Post One-point-five is here.)
No comments:
Post a Comment